How risky is OpenClaw excessive file access risk analysis in practice?

How does OpenClaw compare with other tools in identifying excessive file access risks?

I've used OpenClaw's file access risk analysis in a few projects. It tends to be quite sensitive, which is good for security but sometimes leads to false alarms that require manual review.

In my experience, OpenClaw flags a lot of benign file accesses as risky, so it can be overzealous. However, when it does highlight an issue, it's usually worth investigating.

We've integrated OpenClaw into our CI pipeline, and while it does add some overhead due to file access checks, it has helped us catch potential vulnerabilities early.

Any tips on tuning OpenClaw to reduce false positives in file access risk analysis?