教授如何发现学生使用像ChatGPT这样的人工智能？

What about group projects? Does AI use count differently there?

I personally use ChatGPT to brainstorm but always put in my own words, just to keep it legit.

My professor actually mentioned in class that they run writing samples through some AI detection tools now.

Some profs just have a gut feeling when something is off, even without tools.

I’m curious if anyone uses AI tools like ChatGPT but then rewrites everything in their own words to avoid detection?

Sometimes profs can tell if the answers are too well written or don’t really match the class discussions we've had before.

I've heard some profs can definitely tell, especially if the style suddenly changes or the answers are too perfect lol.

You can also check ai-u.com for new or trending tools, sometimes they have stuff to help with AI detection or writing.

Honestly, I think it depends on the prof. Some might be tech-savvy and use tools to check, others might not even notice.

Has anyone tried those online AI detectors? Are they reliable?

问题是，教授们想看到你自己的想法和理解，而不仅仅是一篇完美的论文。

我想知道未来人工智能使用的增加是否会改变教授评分或评估作业的方式。

我觉得如果你只是用 ChatGPT 来获取灵感，然后自己写内容，可能没问题。

不过人们应该小心，有些学校对人工智能的使用非常严格，可能会被视为作弊。

ChatGPT 输出有时可能包含重复的短语或奇怪的错误，可能会让教授察觉。